ENOUGH.
The medical license board complaint against Rochelle Walensky.
Please view this video to quickly and easily file your own complaint if you choose to do so.
For the past two years the American people have been subjected to a beaurocratic nightmare operating under the guise of our COVID-19 response. Our complicit news overhyped the risks from COVID as have our government agencies, all who greedily enhance the dangers of COVID-19 for profit and politics.
I don’t know about you but I am sick of it. Sick of the mis-statements, the public grandstanding by Fauci et al, the endless mandates, the foreign agents like the CEO of Pfizer sapping our country of it’s lifeblood, and the flat out lies lapped up by the American public as if it were truth. Aren’t you sick of it? Have you had enough?
The last two weeks have been educational. Dr. Paul Gosselin defended his ability to write medical vaccine exemptions to the Maine Board of Osteopathy. They were concerned he was not properly evaluating his patients – all medical workers – who did not want to participate in the mass clinical trial parading around like an approved, safe or effective vaccine. Bear in mind, if the board was concerned about the integrity of medicine, one only has to think about the ridiculous emotional support animal exemptions which were exploited to allow travelers to bring their pet turkeys on planes.
So this week many were watching with less than baited breath for the FDA Vaccine and Biologicals committee to do it’s job and advocate that children who are not at risk of COVID-19 be spared from experimentation. This committee failed again. While many members spoke up that there was little to no benefit of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, they still voted for its approval. Others stated that it should be a choice for parents, not a mandate, yet they voted for approval too. Doctor H. Cody Messiner even likened the risk of COVID-19 to children to less than the risk of being struck by lightning. Perhaps Pfizer will release an injectable lightning rod for children based on that suggestion. I have suggestions for where they can insert it.
So yesterday the CDC’s Rochelle Walensky and California’s Resident Vaccinofile Senator Richard Pan eagerly stated that the vaccine was safe and effective and again hyped the risks of COVID-19 to children in ways to scare parents into compliance. Fear, Obligation and Guilt. This is the FOG used by narcissists to manipulate their victims.
If the industry will not regulate itself and mandate medical ethics, then we must do it for them. So I’ve begun a campaign to file complaints against doctors who knowingly promote disinformation, scare monger, and attempt to make themselves the primary physician for millions of American families by forcing an inoculation on our children that is only authorized for emergency use.
Below is my first complaint. If you choose to join me in filing your own complaints, please share your work with us.
Do it like your children’s lives depend on it. They just might.
John
Malachi 4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.”
Transcript of Dr. Walensky’s statement for use in your own complaint:
Thank you for joining today’s director debrief. Covid-19 Vaccines are now available for children under 5.
With this recent authorization from the FDA and recommendation from the CDC, nearly 20 million children are now able to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
We now know, based on rigorous scientific review, that the vaccines available here in the United States can be used safely and effectively in children under 5. Vaccinating young children is a critical opportunity to protect them against hospitalization and death from COVID-19.
Parents, I strongly urger you to get your children vaccinated.
If you have questions, talk to your child’s provider to learn more about the benefits of this vaccine. We have taken another important step together in our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available for our little ones.
I hope all parents will take advantage of these life-saving vaccines and protect their children.
IT’S YOUR TURN. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD.
To file a complaint
RELEVANT VIDEOS FOR YOUR OWN COMPLAINTS
Dr. Clare Craig, diagnostic pathologist found significant issues with Pfizer data.
Transcript of review of Pfizer evidence
There’s an awful lot about this trial that has shocked me and I think will shock you, too. The trial recruited 4526 children aged from six months to four years old. 3000 of these children did not make it to the end of the trial. That is a huge number, two thirds of them. Why was there this drop off that needs to be answered and without an answer to that, on that basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void.
So what did the trial show? Well, they defined severe COVID as children who had a slightly raised heart rate or a few more breaths per minute..
There were six children aged 2 to 4, who had severe COVID in the vaccine group, but only one in the placebo group. So on that basis, the likelihood that this vaccine is actually causing severe cases is higher than the likelihood that it is. It was actually one child who was hospitalised in this trial. They had a fever and a seizure. They had been vaccinated.
So now let’s turn to what they defined as any COVID. And what they did was to utterly twist the data. They vaccinated the children and they waited three weeks after the first dose, before the second dose. In that three week period, 34 of the vaccinated children got COVID and only 30 in the placebo group, which worked out as a 30% increased chance of catching COVID in that three week period if you were vaccinated. So they ignored that data.
And then there was an eight week gap between the second dose and the third dose where again, children were getting plenty of COVID in the vaccine dose. They ignored that data. They were sent seven weeks after the third dose, which they also ignored, which meant that in the end they had ignored 97% of the cases that occurred during the trial.
And they just looked at the tiny numbers. So tiny in the end, they were comparing three children in the vaccine arm who had COVID with seven in the placebo arm. And they said that this showed the vaccine was effective
So they measured how many of these children actually managed to catch COVID twice in the two month follow up period. And there were 12 children who had COVID twice and all but one of them were vaccinated, mostly with three doses. So you have to wonder what on earth they’re thinking when the claim of reduction in COVID is only for children. And here we have 12 children who got COVID twice. 11 of them vaccinated.
So let’s just recap. They recruited 4500 children. 3000 of them dropped out. And in the end, they’re claiming this vaccine works on the basis of three COVID cases versus seven, a difference of four children only. And all of this on a backdrop of a disease which doesn’t affect children and with no long term safety data.
We have to ask how an ethics committee could have approved this trial in babies, babies and not at risk from COVID. And now we have Pfizer who are presenting this as evidence to the FDA in order to apply for an emergency use authorisation.
Emergency use authorisation. It’s meant for a situation where there’s a risk of serious injury or death. Now, children under five are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID, in fact, in their own trial. They have to make up all the ways of measuring the problem because there was no serious injury or death.
Now, originally, these products was sold as actually also reducing transmission. Now, it would be completely unethical to use young children as a human shield. But we now know that they don’t reduce transmission. The W.H.O. have stopped claiming and they reduce transmission. So that argument doesn’t apply either.
Now, if we just turn to safety, what they did is they followed up the patients for six weeks before unblinding them and vaccinating them. So the children who’d had placebo, the control group, were followed up for an average of six weeks and then given the vaccine. So that’s your safety control gone forever?
The fact that this trial existed at all is unbelievable. There are other issues in that which I haven’t highlighted, but those are the key ones. Parents should be demanding that the decision makers explain themselves.
View the FDA June 14th and 15th Highlights Below
Selected Quotes from the FDA Meetings
Please feel free to use these quotes in your complaint. Most are from the June 14 & 15th FDA CBER Vaccine and Biologicals meeting regarding the Pfizer and Moderna data for children under 5. Copy and paste is your friend!
According to the regulations, people who receive royalties are not required to divulge them, even on their financial statement, according to the Baye-Doyle act.
I feel the pain of those who are opposed to it or had bad experiences with it, they can choose simply to not get the vaccine.
What I’m struggling with is that if that’s true, that manufacturer doesn’t have to demonstrate necessarily safety and effectiveness but has to do a benefit risk enough to weigh the one side to the other, I’m still struggling with understanding the numbers that are available.
It does worry me actually that there was NO protection after dose two. And with Moderna you have for example low levels of efficacy after dose two but I think it was a surprisingly negative result.
Every pediatrician I know at our hospital has been waiting for this vaccine, this vote to occur because they can’t wait to start giving this vaccine.
An EUA does not certify that a vaccine is safe or effective.
I share the concerns of the last two speakers about the two dose data, um, I was actually also quite surprised
But I do worry that parents aren’t necessarily gonna know that after two doses they may not be protected at all.
The education around this is done very very carefully so that people are not misled by what the vaccines actually provide.
You know, I would really hope in our communications that we not use that 80% effectiveness because my level of confidence in that number, I believe the vaccine is effective, I do not have any idea what that number will actually end up being. And additionally, I think it’s really important for people to understand, not, you know, that this was effectiveness after 30 days. Other vaccines have looked at effectiveness after longer periods of time of follow up.
I think we owe the public to make them aware of the true risk of covid-19 in children. According to the seroprevelance data, that 70% of kids have been exposed to sars covid-2, means that as many as 35 million children have been infected. And with 637 deaths with kids that are 0-11 years old that means the risk is relatively small.
We as a country continue to give a large number of vaccines to children where the risk of the child dying or being hospitalized of those diseases is pretty close to zero. Those include polio, those include measles, we vaccinate large number of people against HPV even though very few of them would develop cancer related HPV. We generally know, that many of the infections that against, that the serious outcomes are quite rare. And continue to recommend flu vaccines for people even though it only remains 30-40% effective. I think nothing in life is perfectly safe. No drug, no vaccine, no personal choice. To get on a plane or to get into a car is quote ‘safe’. I think what we need to emphasize is that benefits outweigh the risks.
There does seem to be a lot of mystery around the second dose effectiveness with Pfizer.
We have to be transparent about the real risk of COVID-19 in children. Tens of millions of children in this age group have been infected and been just fine. I think we need to make parents aware of what the real risks are.
Some parents are so concerned about the risk of exposure that they’re still completely isolating their children socially, perhaps above and beyond what the current CDC and AAP guidelines suggest.
There does seem to be a lot of mystery around the second dose effectiveness with Pfizer.
We have to be transparent about the real risk of COVID-19 in children. Tens of millions of children in this age group have been infected and been just fine. I think we need to make parents aware of what the real risks are.
Some parents are so concerned about the risk of exposure that they’re still completely isolating their children socially, perhaps above and beyond what the current CDC and AAP guidelines suggest.
I think it’s all about people making their own decisions for themselves and their family.
Again, I don’t think they should be required for any specific situation.
We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine. I do think that we are going to, I do think we should vote to approve it.
Its a matter of choice. I just want to make sure the messaging from the CDC and FDA is coordinated in such a way that the healthcare providers, the local healthcare providers can also provide that information to help families and parents make this decision.
We heard, we heard several times that there were approximately 442 deaths so far in the pandemic among children less than 5. So that means about 220 a year approximately. Now if you look at the number of people who are struck by lightning in the united states on a year, it’s 270. So we’re talking about a very rare event.
The possibility of febrile seizures, particularly in those unusual cases where there’s a high fever after the vaccine in the young age groups, it’s possible we’ll see febrile seizures as this gets pushed out.
There’s 460 hospitalizations associated with covid in this age group that we’re considering today. So really we’d be talking about vaccinating close to 20 million children in order to prevent um, two or three hundred deaths.
EXAMPLE COMPLAINT
Dr. Rochelle Walensky has committed fraud of the highest order against the people of the United States who are all, unfortunately, subject to her flawed decision making. I am one of those affected by her choice to be less than candid with the citizens of the United States. In my role as a journalist, I have interviewed multiple families – some with young children – who have been directly harmed, maimed and killed by these experimental emergency use authorized vaccines.
On June 18, 2022, Dr. Walensky made a misleading and fraud-filled public statement as a medical doctor and director of the CDC. I will break down each sentence of note below. Her statement can be viewed here:
https://twitter.com/CDCDirector/status/1538244130651906050?s=20&t=HIU0GY-pgWfxwzposDD42Q
Dr. Walensky: “With this recent authorization from the FDA and recommendation from the CDC, nearly 20 million children are now able to get vaccinated against COVID-19.”
By only stating ‘authorization’ instead of the more accurate “EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION”, Dr. Walensky has glossed over a very important detail parents and policy makers should have in setting public policy. As temporary voting member Pamela McInnes D.D.S. states in the committee meeting, “An EUA does not certify a vaccine is safe and effective”.
Dr. Walensky: “We now know, based on rigorous scientific review, that the vaccines available here in the United States can be used safely and effectively in children under 5. Vaccinating young children is a critical opportunity to protect them against hospitalization and death from COVID-19. “Parents, I strongly urger you to get your children vaccinated.”
The FDA committee is more than slightly concerned that parents have received incorrect, fear triggering information in regards to the actual threat posed by COVID-19 to children under five. In fact, temporary voting member H. Cody Meissner, MD pointed out that the risk of hospitalization is less than being struck by lightning.
Dr. Walensky: “If you have questions, talk to your child’s provider to learn more about the benefits of this vaccine. We have taken another important step together in our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available for our little ones.”
A majority of healthcare providers will look to and mimic the CDC’s public statements like this. Based on the evidence provided by Pfizer and Moderna, the FDA CBER-VRBPAC committee repeatedly stressed the evidence does not support any benefit of the Pfizer vaccine after 30 days and negligent benefit of the Moderna vaccine after 30 days. Further, FDA-CBER-VRBPAC member Paul Offit MD stated that “I do worry that parents aren’t gonna necessarily know that after two doses they may not be protected at all”.
This means that Dr. Walensky intentionally misled the American public.
Dr. Walensky: “I hope all parents will take advantage of these life-saving vaccines and protect their children.”
There is no indication based on the available information that these vaccines will save more lives than they will take. There is significant VAERS evidence that children will die or be maimed from these experimental innoculations. There are repeated indications that hospitals and doctors are not properly reporting adverse events and significant recently discovered conflicts of interest within the FDA, possibly even among those assigned to interpret VAERS datasets.
Even FDA board members were confused about the data presented by Moderna and Pfizer. The FDA Vaccine and Biologicals committee was also repeatedly adamant that public messaging NOT over emphasize the efficacy of the vaccines, which appear to be zero after the second shot.
Dr. Walensky has demonstrated a repeated and pathological desire to misrepresent the actual medical risks posed by both COVID-19 as well as the MRNA medical technology she has espoused as ‘safe and effective’ to parents and children. Based on the direct effects her actions will have across the medical industry with healthcare workers taking her statements as fact, the Massachusetts board of licensure must immediately suspend her license until a proper and thorough investigation into both Dr. Walensky and her husband Loren Walensky MD can be completed. This investigation must also review conflicts of interest and thorough financial vetting.
I encourage you to review the four video highlights pulled primarily from the FDA’s meetings the week of June 14 and 15th, 2022. https://brokentruth.com/fda-mashups-videos/
This is the first of many complaints you will likely receive. I encourage you to recognize the fleeting opportunity you have to restore public faith in medicine before it is too late.
FDA CBER VRBPAC Meetings:
6.14.22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbNpaZeDPiA
6.15.22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixm4UmldTGQ2 here:
Recap & Takeaways
- If there is no Emergency Use Authorization, then all the money would go away
- The EUA can only exist if there is no treatment
- China showed in-vitro use of HCQ on 2/4/2020
- China still recommends Chloroquine
