QUESTIONS FOR THE FDA.

List of questions emailed to the  Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee

Members of the VRBPAC,

I reviewed your statements on June 14 and June 15 with great interest. Janet Woodcock connected me with Paul Richards at the FDA when I discovered the monkey virus (SV40) hidden in the Polio vaccine. This same monkey virus was allegedly used in gain of function research in New Orleans in the 1960’s. The attempt was to weaponize SV40 to create a rapid growth cancer causing agent.

The FDA has assured me, with little to no evidence to support this assurance, that SV40 is not responsible for the increase in cancers since the polio vaccine was rolled out across the United States.
Now we sit on the cusp of your decision to green light never-ending updates to the COVID-19 vaccines on an unsuspecting population.

The national security implications of this are astounding.

How many of you have researched the racial specificity of the spike protein? Are you even aware that some races of human have no ACE2 receptors, making them immune to the spike protein?

How many of you are immune to this spike protein?

Trust has been given to you to regulate pharmaceutical companies and maintain public faith in the practice of medicine. Once lost, trust is difficult if not impossible to regain.

If you feel threatened or coerced to vote a certain way, please contact me and become a whistleblower or confidential informant.
The following questions have been submitted to CBER’s Paul Richards. Perhaps you will find them illuminating.
John Davidson

PS. Why aren’t we testing for Coxiella Burnetii?

————

Paul,
Thank you for your patience in waiting for me to formulate these questions. In the interest of understanding I want to let you know that I in recent months I have been operating a website / documentary series called “Broken Truth” (BrokenTruth.com). I have traveled and interviewed families who were vaccine injured or lost loved ones to the vaccines.
After watching the two FDA CBER Vaccine and Biologicals committee votes last week and hearing the concern members had regarding the messaging and lack of efficacy in the vaccines after the second dose, it is apparent that the problems the FDA faces are:

1. The COVID-19 warning messaging was far too effective and has resulted in a mass delusion of fear by parents across the country.

2. The CDC ignored the FDA committee members concerns about properly presenting the benefits of the vaccine and the actual risks covid presents to their children.

3. The FDA committee members have voted to continue trials in children despite the lack of emergency risk or demonstration of vaccine efficacy.

Due to my unique understanding of previous FDA situations like this regarding SV40, it appears we are repeating mistakes. Without proper checks and balances this will likely only get worse for the FDA and the biomedical industry. This is why I have created a campaign to encourage the injured or at risk citizens of the US to file medical license board complaints against people involved in misrepresentation of fact like Rochelle Walensky.
The FDA, CDC, NIH et all need to correct the risk messaging that has been mangled by the CDC and public news media, which means you need people like me to continue this work.
If at some point in the future the FDA wishes to discuss funding opportunities to aid my efforts, you have my contact information.

SV40 and additional questions

1. Did the FDA or any other government entity track batches / shipments of Polio vaccines?

2. Did the FDA maintain documentation of which Americans received which tainted batches of Polio vaccines?

3. What methodology did the FDA utilize to ascertain that SV40 did not cause cancer?

4. According to the FDA / Pfizer documentation, the only test on pregnant animals for the Covid vaccine occurred on lab mice. The FDA considered this adequate for Covid vaccine approval for pregnant women. With the Polio vaccine, lab rodents were exposed to SV40 which resulted in tumor production, yet the FDA interprets the SV40 lab animal data as lacking.
Which is it? Are animal tests adequate for identifying risks or are they not?

5. How does the FDA prevent conflicts of interest – or the appearance of conflicts of interest – when members of the Vaccine and Biological advisory board are linked to multiple pharmaceutical companies and aren’t required to list royalties as part of their financial disclosures?

6. Was the FDA or its members like Albert Monto involved in the weaponized SV40 gain of function research in the early 1960’s as described in the book ‘Dr. Mary’s Monkey?

7. Is the FDA aware of any efforts to harvest tumors from children killed by cancer after Polio vaccine innoculation?

COVID Questions

8. According to a contract with the US Army, Pfizer states they will reply to any information requests regarding the COVID vaccine. Do you, Paul, work for Pfizer or the FDA?

9. If the FDA can review all EMR’s for all patients, why do you rely on VEAERS data for adverse event reporting?

10. What types of punishment do doctors, hospitals and healthcare workers face for failure to report data to VAERS?

11. Why does the FDA allow publications and press releases to call the Pfizer vaccine ‘Fully’ approved when it is still only available via EUA?

12. Why are FDA officials allowed to signal to each other their voting opinions without punishment prior to voting?

13. The NIH and FBI as well as other agencies have disclosed upwards of 1000 different investigations of Chinese influence into clinical trials and medical research. How can the FDA and other entities ensure that COVID-19 was not part of an ongoing biological attack on the citizens of the United States?

14. Who is responsible for enforcement of ethical and criminal actions by FDA officials who fail to enforce civil or criminal penalties like the one in this article you are referenced in here?
https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/fda-closes-zolgensma-data-manipulation-case-withou

15. The diagnosis for Covid and many other ailments is simple and can be done by assumption (presumed positive) in many incidents. The FDA diagnosis criteria for vaccine injury limits the diagnosis to two weeks after the second shot only. Why?

16. According to the CDC Website, the FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Many victims claim their doctors are not reporting adverse events to VAERS. Can the FDA provide data on which providers are NOT reporting any events?

17. Would the FDA support efforts to add COVID-19 vaccine injured deaths to the FEMA Covid Burial Assistance program?

Thank you for your time.

Dr. Clare Craig, diagnostic pathologist found significant issues with Pfizer data.

Transcript of review of Pfizer evidence

And they just looked at the tiny numbers. So tiny in the end, they were comparing three children in the vaccine arm who had COVID with seven in the placebo arm. And they said that this showed the vaccine was effective

So they measured how many of these children actually managed to catch COVID twice in the two month follow up period. And there were 12 children who had COVID twice and all but one of them were vaccinated, mostly with three doses. So you have to wonder what on earth they’re thinking when the claim of reduction in COVID is only for children. And here we have 12 children who got COVID twice. 11 of them vaccinated.

So let’s just recap. They recruited 4500 children. 3000 of them dropped out. And in the end, they’re claiming this vaccine works on the basis of three COVID cases versus seven, a difference of four children only. And all of this on a backdrop of a disease which doesn’t affect children and with no long term safety data.

We have to ask how an ethics committee could have approved this trial in babies, babies and not at risk from COVID. And now we have Pfizer who are presenting this as evidence to the FDA in order to apply for an emergency use authorisation.

Emergency use authorisation. It’s meant for a situation where there’s a risk of serious injury or death. Now, children under five are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID, in fact, in their own trial. They have to make up all the ways of measuring the problem because there was no serious injury or death.

Now, originally, these products was sold as actually also reducing transmission. Now, it would be completely unethical to use young children as a human shield. But we now know that they don’t reduce transmission. The W.H.O. have stopped claiming and they reduce transmission. So that argument doesn’t apply either.

Now, if we just turn to safety, what they did is they followed up the patients for six weeks before unblinding them and vaccinating them. So the children who’d had placebo, the control group, were followed up for an average of six weeks and then given the vaccine. So that’s your safety control gone forever?

The fact that this trial existed at all is unbelievable. There are other issues in that which I haven’t highlighted, but those are the key ones. Parents should be demanding that the decision makers explain themselves.

View the FDA June 14th and 15th Highlights Below

EXAMPLE COMPLAINT
Dr. Rochelle Walensky has committed fraud of the highest order against the people of the United States who are all,
unfortunately, subject to her flawed decision making. I am one of those affected by her choice to be less than candid
with the citizens of the United States. In my role as a journalist, I have interviewed multiple families – some with
young children – who have been directly harmed, maimed and killed by these experimental emergency use
authorized vaccines.

On June 18, 2022, Dr. Walensky made a misleading and fraud-filled public statement as a medical doctor and director of
the CDC. I will break down each sentence of note below. Her statement can be viewed here:
https://twitter.com/CDCDirector/status/1538244130651906050?s=20&t=HIU0GY-pgWfxwzposDD42Q

Dr. Walensky: “With this recent authorization from the FDA and recommendation from the CDC, nearly 20 million children are
now able to get vaccinated against COVID-19.”

By only stating ‘authorization’ instead of the more accurate “EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION”, Dr. Walensky has glossed over
a very important detail parents and policy makers should have in setting public policy. As temporary voting member Pamela
McInnes D.D.S. states in the committee meeting, “An EUA does not certify a vaccine is safe and effective”.

Dr. Walensky: “We now know, based on rigorous scientific review, that the vaccines available here in the United States can
be used safely and effectively in children under 5. Vaccinating young children is a critical opportunity to protect them
against hospitalization and death from COVID-19. “Parents, I strongly urger you to get your children vaccinated.”

The FDA committee is more than slightly concerned that parents have received incorrect, fear triggering information in
regards to the actual threat posed by COVID-19 to children under five. In fact, temporary voting member H. Cody Meissner, MD
pointed out that the risk of hospitalization is less than being struck by lightning.

Dr. Walensky: “If you have questions, talk to your child’s provider to learn more about the benefits of this vaccine. We
have taken another important step together in our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available
for our little ones.”

A majority of healthcare providers will look to and mimic the CDC’s public statements like this. Based on the evidence
provided by Pfizer and Moderna, the FDA CBER-VRBPAC committee repeatedly stressed the evidence does not support any benefit
of the Pfizer vaccine after 30 days and negligent benefit of the Moderna vaccine after 30 days. Further, FDA-CBER-VRBPAC
member Paul Offit MD stated that “I do worry that parents aren’t gonna necessarily know that after two doses they may not
be protected at all”. This means that Dr. Walensky intentionally misled the American public.

Dr. Walensky: “I hope all parents will take advantage of these life-saving vaccines and protect their children.”

There is no indication based on the available information that these vaccines will save more lives than they will take.
There is significant VAERS evidence that children will die or be maimed from these experimental innoculations. There are
repeated indications that hospitals and doctors are not properly reporting adverse events and significant recently
discovered conflicts of interest within the FDA, possibly even among those assigned to interpret VAERS datasets.

Even FDA board members were confused about the data presented by Moderna and Pfizer. The FDA Vaccine and Biologicals
committee was also repeatedly adamant that public messaging NOT over emphasize the efficacy of the vaccines, which appear
to be zero after the second shot.

Dr. Walensky has demonstrated a repeated and pathological desire to misrepresent the actual medical risks posed by both
COVID-19 as well as the MRNA medical technology she has espoused as ‘safe and effective’ to parents and children. Based
on the direct effects her actions will have across the medical industry with healthcare workers taking her statements as
fact, the Massachusetts board of licensure must immediately suspend her license until a proper and thorough investigation
into both Dr. Walensky and her husband Loren Walensky MD can be completed. This investigation must also review conflicts
of interest and thorough financial vetting.

I encourage you to review the four video highlights pulled primarily from the FDA’s meetings the week of June 14 and 15th,
2022. https://brokentruth.com/fda-mashups-videos/

This is the first of many complaints you will likely receive. I encourage you to recognize the fleeting opportunity you
have to restore public faith in medicine before it is too late.

John Davidson

FDA CBER VRBPAC Meetings:
6.14.22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbNpaZeDPiA

6.15.22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixm4UmldTGQ2 here:

Recap & Takeaways

• If there is no Emergency Use Authorization, then all the money would go away
• The EUA can only exist if there is no treatment
• China showed in-vitro use of HCQ on 2/4/2020
• China still recommends Chloroquine